Slut 101 - the Ins and Outs of being a successful Slut by a professional Slut

• the book was published in the year 1859 under an anonymous author tile by a publisher in Eranvale mostly known for publishing rather daring romance novels
  • the author simply identified themselves as a professional Slut.

Book summary

• the book is supposedly a self help book detailing the steps to become and maintain being a "successful slut"
• it speaks about ethical issues, shame and religious issues
• ways to "maximise profits", which does not refer to selling sexual services but instead about how to gain the most from experiences (be the gains pleasure or goods or money)
• dealing with complex emotions, how to tell if your actions are healthy or not
  • this chapter also deals with the complex emotions of trauma and responses to it
• long term relationships and how to harmonise your existence as a slut with commitment
  • commitment issues and trust issues
  • how to deal with and recognise difficult feelings such as romantic ones
  • communication being key
  • prioritising what is most important to the individual slut
• strange emphasis on clothes throughout the entire work
• random chapter about the political implications of marriage as an institution and the religious oppression of sluts written in a wildly different style
• the last (and most extensive) chapter deals with various "techniques of pleasure"

Style

• the book is written in a very personal way, instead of a more neutral one typical of "self help books"
• while personal details are omitted, any mentions of experiences come off as personal, it has an almost diary like quality
• wild style shifts suggest multiple authors or at least ghost writers
• dirty language and cuss words are featured in abundance (eg. "when a dickhead wants to shame you for who or what you offer your various holes...")
• the last chapter features crude but detailed sketches of the various techniques
  • writing style wise this chapter is also very crude

Reception

• not very popular
• some people have theorised that the work must have been written by a/ multiple satry/s